Dan Bongino Reveals REAL Story Behind Firing Of Parler CEO: The Story You’re Hearing Is Not Correct, Don’t Believe The Hype
Dan Bongino breaks down the most recent story coming out about the firing of Parler CEO, John Matze and Dan wants everyone to know that they should not believe the hype.
Fox News obtained a memo sent by Matze’s staffers reported by Daily Wire and Bongino called them out saying there was 2 separate visions for the future of Parler. Matze claimed to care for ‘free speech’
Matze wrote, “Over the past few months, I’ve met constant resistance to my product vision, my strong belief in free speech and my view of how the Parler site should be managed. For example, I advocated for more product stability and what I believe is a more effective approach to content moderation.”
Fox reported, “”On January 29, 2021, the Parler board controlled by Rebekah Mercer decided to immediately terminate my position as CEO of Parler. I did not participate in this decision,” Matze wrote. “I understand that those who now control the company have made some communications to employees and other third parties that have unfortunately created confusion and prompted me to make this public statement.”
Dan Bongino said they could have brought Parler back up in a week if they ‘bent the knee’ by following Big Tech’s guidelines and the statements by Matze on the memo are false. Bongino alleges him and the other 2 co-owners are the ones who prioritized free speech in their vision. Dan said he warned and advocated for more product stability but Matze was the one who wanted to follow Big Tech’s guidelines and moderate content.
Matze has said he did not participate in the board’s decision to remove him and claimed he was the one who wanted to maintain his free speech principles but others had other ideas about moderating content.
Bongino wants everyone to share his message and for people to know that Parler is absolutely committed to free speech and how him and the 2 co-owners are the ones who want to maintain the free speech principles. It is alleged that Matze was the one who wanted to “bend the knee” to Big Tech in order to return and not pursue the same vision as Dan and the other 2 co-owners.
